Renault Wind MOT Results

Registered in 2010

56.7% pass rate

from 737 tests in 2021

(21% worse than other 2010 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Wind is unusually good or bad.

22% fail on Suspension (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 19% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 19% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 19% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.41% fail on Mounting (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Suspension arms (54% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.27% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.54% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.41% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
11% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 10% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 10% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.14% fail on Steering arm
- 0.27% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.27% fail on Steering rack
10% fail on Brakes
- 5.6% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.0% fail on Rbt
      - 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.95% fail on Rbt
      - 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.68% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.68% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      - 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 3.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 3.8% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.9% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.14% fail on Cable
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.68% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.27% fail on Pedal
- 0.41% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.27% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.27% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.27% fail on Electronic stability control
7.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (38% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.9% fail on Headlamp
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.6% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
    - 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.95% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.81% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.68% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.41% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.41% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.27% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.14% fail on Position lamp
- 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp
6.0% fail on Visibility
- 3.5% fail on Washers
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.14% fail on View to rear
  - 0.14% fail on Mirrors
4.1% fail on Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
2.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 1.8% fail on Transmission
  - 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
    - 1.6% fail on Joints
  - 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.14% fail on Joints
- 0.54% fail on Exhaust system
2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
    - 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.14% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.68% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.68% fail on Attachment

Read the Honest John Review

Renault Wind (2010 - 2012)
Stylish two-seater roadster coupe with a roomy cabin, decent bootspace, efficient and economical engines. Roof folds away quickly and neatly.