Renault Twingo MOT Results

Registered in 2015
77.0% pass rate
from 5,231 tests in 2021
(23% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Twingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.1% fail on Visibility (81% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers (93% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (72% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on View to rear
      • 0.096% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.019% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.019% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres (38% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 5.7% fail on Suspension (76% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 1.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.8% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.019% fail on Mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.019% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.019% fail on Linkage
    • 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.038% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.019% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.038% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.038% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.019% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint
  • 3.5% fail on Brakes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.019% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.076% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.057% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.019% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.019% fail on Rbt
          • 0.019% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.019% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.096% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.076% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.038% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.076% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.057% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.057% fail on Lever
    • 0.057% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.057% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.038% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.019% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.019% fail on Other components
  • 2.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.57% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.27% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.27% fail on Individual direction indicators (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.23% fail on Headlamps (78% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (72% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.096% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.076% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.076% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.076% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.038% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.019% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.019% fail on Horn
    • 0.019% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.019% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.019% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.019% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (73% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (74% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Spark ignition (200% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.038% fail on Compression ignition (92% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.019% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.076% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.057% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.019% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.84% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.50% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.038% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.019% fail on Hose
      • 0.019% fail on Pipe
    • 0.057% fail on Doors
      • 0.057% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.057% fail on Door condition
    • 0.038% fail on Body
      • 0.019% fail on Panel
      • 0.019% fail on Other body component
    • 0.038% fail on Undertray
    • 0.019% fail on Load security
      • 0.019% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.019% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.019% fail on Seats
      • 0.019% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.019% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.019% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 0.21% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.096% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.096% fail on Condition
    • 0.096% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.019% fail on Airbags
      • 0.019% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.19% fail on Steering
    • 0.15% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.096% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.038% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.038% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.096% fail on Condition
    • 0.019% fail on Attachment
  • 0.038% fail on Identification of the vehicle (82% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Registration plates (82% better than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages