MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Megane Scenic » 2000

Renault Megane Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.0% pass rate
from 751 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Megane Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Hazard warning (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Switch (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (91% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (52% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.27% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.27% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.53% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Position lamp
  • 15% fail on Visibility (89% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 10% fail on Washers (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 7.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.27% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (57% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (54% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt
          • 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.4% fail on Brake discs and drums (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Brake discs (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Pivot
    • 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.80% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.27% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.13% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.40% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.27% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.27% fail on Leaks (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.53% fail on Pins and bushes (70% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.5% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.93% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint (40 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.80% fail on Axles (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.27% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (94% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust system (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Transmission (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts (79% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Joints (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 0.53% fail on Engine mounting (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Engine mounting condition (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.13% fail on Hose
    • 0.40% fail on Body
      • 0.40% fail on Other body component
    • 0.27% fail on Chassis
      • 0.13% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.13% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.27% fail on Boot lid (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Boot lid condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.13% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Catch
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Cabs
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.40% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.40% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.80% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.13% fail on Rams
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.53% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.53% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (55% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.40% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages