MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Grand Modus » 2009

Renault Grand Modus MOT Results

Registered in 2009
53.6% pass rate
from 604 tests in 2021
(18% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Modus is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 14% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 14% fail on Coil springs (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 14% fail on Coil spring (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.99% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.33% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.33% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.33% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.66% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.50% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.33% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.17% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Position lamp
  • 7.3% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.33% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.17% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.5% fail on Brakes (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.83% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt
          • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.17% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.66% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.66% fail on Lever
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.33% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.33% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Valves
    • 0.17% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.17% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.17% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.3% fail on Joints
      • 0.17% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
    • 0.66% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.17% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.17% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.17% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.17% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.17% fail on Undertray
  • 0.17% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.17% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages