Renault Captur MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.4% pass rate
from 24,354 tests in 2021
(9.2% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Captur is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.021% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.021% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.012% fail on View to rear
      • 0.012% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0041% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (16% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (15% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (31% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (36% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (80% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Stop lamp (53% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.28% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.18% fail on Direction indicators (51% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Flashing type (51% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.074% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0041% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.070% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (62% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.016% fail on Horn
      • 0.0082% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0041% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.012% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.012% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.012% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 2.8% fail on Brakes
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (23% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (19% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (19% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0041% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.34% fail on Brake discs and drums (30% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Brake discs (29% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0041% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0041% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (60% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance (76% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (75% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance (87% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0082% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0082% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.39% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.025% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.012% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0082% fail on Decelerometer (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0041% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0041% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0041% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0041% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.082% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.0041% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control (79% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Lever (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (87% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Pedal
    • 0.045% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.041% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.037% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.0041% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.029% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.021% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.016% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.0041% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0041% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 2.0% fail on Suspension
    • 0.90% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joints (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0082% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0041% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.80% fail on Suspension arms (62% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.012% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.23% fail on Springs (80% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Coil spring (80% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0041% fail on Mounting
    • 0.053% fail on Shock absorbers (61% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.029% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Suspension rods (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0082% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0041% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.012% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0041% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0041% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0041% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0041% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.27% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Exhaust emissions (66% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Compression ignition (55% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0041% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.0041% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.12% fail on Spark ignition (75% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Catalyst emissions (88% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (67% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Transmission (51% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (47% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Joints (48% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0041% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.016% fail on Body
      • 0.0082% fail on Panel
      • 0.0082% fail on Other body component
    • 0.016% fail on Seats
      • 0.0082% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0082% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.012% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.0082% fail on Exhaust system (95% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Doors
      • 0.0082% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0082% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0041% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0041% fail on Pipe
    • 0.0041% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0041% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.0041% fail on Undertray
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.094% fail on Attachment
    • 0.029% fail on Condition
  • 0.11% fail on Identification of the vehicle (50% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Registration plates (52% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0041% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.10% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Seat belts (55% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0041% fail on Requirements
    • 0.029% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0041% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0041% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.045% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.041% fail on Steering linkage components (81% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.016% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0041% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0041% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0041% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0041% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0041% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0041% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.0082% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0082% fail on Speedometer (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.0082% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0082% fail on Anchorages (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages