MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Proton » Savvy » 2010

Proton Savvy MOT Results

Registered in 2010
56.7% pass rate
from 208 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Savvy is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.48% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.48% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.48% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
    • 6.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 2.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.96% fail on Lever
    • 0.96% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.48% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.48% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.96% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.96% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.96% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (44 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.96% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.48% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.48% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 11% fail on Visibility (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.48% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.8% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Power steering (34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Operation (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Other components (69 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Pipes and hoses (53 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
  • 5.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.96% fail on Transmission
      • 0.96% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.48% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.48% fail on Joints
    • 0.96% fail on Doors
      • 0.96% fail on Other passenger's door (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Door condition (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.48% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.48% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.96% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.96% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (140 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.8% fail on Suspension (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.96% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.48% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.48% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.48% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.48% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.96% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.48% fail on Size/type
  • 0.48% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.48% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages