Proton Savvy MOT Results

Registered in 2008
43.1% pass rate
from 167 tests in 2021
(39% worse than other 2008 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Savvy is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 9.6% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.60% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.60% fail on Pivot
    • 4.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.2% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (24 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.60% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.60% fail on Pressure storage reservoirs
      • 0.60% fail on Air and vacuum systems
    • 0.60% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.60% fail on Other components
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Battery(ies) (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.60% fail on Horn
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.60% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.60% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.60% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 8.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.6% fail on Wheel bearings (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.60% fail on Springs
      • 0.60% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.60% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.60% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.60% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Transmission
      • 3.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.0% fail on Joints
    • 3.0% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Other passenger's door (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Door condition (17 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Chassis
      • 0.60% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.60% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Pipe
      • 0.60% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (200% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.60% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.60% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.6% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.60% fail on Size/type
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.0% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Power steering (19 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Other components (42 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pipes and hoses (29 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.60% fail on Operation
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.60% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.60% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages