MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Porsche » Cayenne » 2009

Porsche Cayenne MOT Results

Registered in 2009
75.5% pass rate
from 932 tests in 2021
(36% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Porsche Cayenne is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.11% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.97% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.43% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
  • 6.9% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Springs
      • 5.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes
    • 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.3% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (40% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (87% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (87% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.97% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.11% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.11% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.54% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.21% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.21% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.11% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.64% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.11% fail on Undertray
  • 1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (68% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Transmission (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Joints (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Passenger's seat (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.75% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.64% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 1.1% fail on Visibility (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Wipers (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Washers (82% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.86% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.86% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.54% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.43% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages