MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » Independance » 2016

Peugeot Independance MOT Results

Registered in 2016
75.8% pass rate
from 545 tests in 2021
(48% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Independance is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.92% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.55% fail on Individual direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.55% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.18% fail on Horn
  • 7.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission (23 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Joints (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Doors (29 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Other passenger's door (56 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (59 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.37% fail on Bumpers (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Body (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Panel (70 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility (58% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.9% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.18% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.0% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.92% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (41 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Hand lever (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 2.4% fail on Suspension
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Springs
      • 0.37% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.37% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.92% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.55% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.18% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages