MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 5008 » 2010

Peugeot 5008 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
49.3% pass rate
from 2,809 tests in 2021
(41% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 5008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.82% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.36% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.036% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.071% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.036% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.036% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.11% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.036% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.036% fail on Switch
  • 17% fail on Suspension (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Springs (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Coil springs (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Coil spring (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Suspension arms (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Linkage
    • 1.00% fail on Wheel bearings (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.32% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.036% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.036% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Brakes (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.68% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.036% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.71% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.61% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.61% fail on Electronic parking brake (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.11% fail on Rigid brake pipes (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.071% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.32% fail on View to rear
      • 0.28% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.036% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.036% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.036% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.036% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.036% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Condition (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 7.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.036% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.036% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.036% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.85% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.036% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.64% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.036% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.036% fail on Undertray
  • 6.1% fail on Steering (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Steering linkage components (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.036% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.036% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 0.036% fail on Components
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.036% fail on Steering play
      • 0.036% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.32% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.21% fail on Body
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component
      • 0.071% fail on Panel
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.071% fail on Undertray
    • 0.036% fail on Towbar
      • 0.036% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.036% fail on Doors
      • 0.036% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.036% fail on Catch
    • 0.036% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Airbags
      • 0.036% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.57% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.57% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages