MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 306 » 1995

Peugeot 306 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
60.3% pass rate
from 237 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 306 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (77% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 8.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 7.6% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.84% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.42% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.84% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.84% fail on Lever
    • 0.84% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.84% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.84% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.42% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.42% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.42% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.42% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp levelling device (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.84% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.84% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.84% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.42% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.42% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.84% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.84% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.42% fail on Axles
      • 0.42% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.42% fail on Springs
      • 0.42% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.42% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 9.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.3% fail on Joints
      • 0.42% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.42% fail on Joints
    • 0.84% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.42% fail on Pipe
      • 0.42% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.84% fail on Body
      • 0.84% fail on Panel
    • 0.42% fail on Chassis
      • 0.42% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.42% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.42% fail on Carrier
    • 0.42% fail on Doors
      • 0.42% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.42% fail on Door condition
    • 0.42% fail on Seats
      • 0.42% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.42% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.42% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 9.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.84% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.42% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.7% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.42% fail on Other leaks
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Washers
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
      • 0.42% fail on Requirements
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.42% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
  • 0.84% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.84% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages