Peugeot 205 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
64.0% pass rate
from 508 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 205 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.20% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.59% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.39% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.39% fail on Switch
  • 15% fail on Brakes (37% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (54% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.98% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.79% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.79% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.79% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.20% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.20% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.20% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.20% fail on Cable
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.20% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.20% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.20% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Transmission (80% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Joints (100% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.20% fail on Joints
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.79% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on Pipe
      • 0.20% fail on Hose
    • 0.79% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.39% fail on Door condition
      • 0.39% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.39% fail on Door condition
    • 0.59% fail on Chassis
      • 0.59% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.59% fail on Seats
      • 0.39% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.20% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.20% fail on Carrier
    • 0.20% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Panel
    • 0.20% fail on Floor
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 6.9% fail on Washers (90% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.7% fail on Suspension
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.79% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.39% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.79% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.39% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.20% fail on Axles
      • 0.20% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.20% fail on Springs
      • 0.20% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.20% fail on Mounting
    • 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.98% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.59% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.59% fail on Operation (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.79% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.59% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.20% fail on Pump
    • 0.59% fail on Steering play
      • 0.59% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Steering column
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
  • 0.98% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.59% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.59% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages