MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 107 » 2005

Peugeot 107 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
51.9% pass rate
from 2,606 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 107 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Headlamps (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Headlamp (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (39% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on All direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.50% fail on Switch (48 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Hazard warning (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Switch (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.077% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.038% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.038% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (46% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.00% fail on Rbt
          • 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.00% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.038% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.038% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.077% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.038% fail on Rod
        • 0.038% fail on Lever
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.38% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.31% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system (78% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.077% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.077% fail on Reservoirs
  • 12% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (34% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (45% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.038% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints (93% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Linkage
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint dust cover (90% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.19% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (70% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.077% fail on Other suspension component (80% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.038% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.077% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.77% fail on Chassis (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Chassis condition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Transmission (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts (84% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Joints (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.038% fail on Joints
    • 0.35% fail on Body
      • 0.19% fail on Panel
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.077% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.038% fail on Tank
      • 0.038% fail on Pipe
    • 0.12% fail on Doors (78% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.038% fail on Door condition
      • 0.038% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.038% fail on Door condition
      • 0.038% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.038% fail on Door condition
    • 0.077% fail on Floor
    • 0.038% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.038% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.038% fail on Undertray
  • 7.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Spark ignition (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (87% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.038% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.038% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 0.15% fail on Compression ignition (89% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.038% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.038% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.038% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.038% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.038% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (31% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.077% fail on View to rear
      • 0.077% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.038% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.038% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment
      • 0.038% fail on Requirements
    • 0.12% fail on Airbags
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.84% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.61% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
  • 0.73% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Electronic power steering (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
    • 0.15% fail on Steering linkage components (95% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.038% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.077% fail on Steering gear (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Operation
      • 0.038% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.038% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.31% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 107 (2005 - 2014)
    Cheap to run. Economical and perky 1.0-litre engine. Fun to drive. Decent cabin room. Ideal first car. 2012 model emits 99g/km CO2.

    Search Good Garages