Peugeot 106 MOT Results

Registered in 2003
56.2% pass rate
from 1,001 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 106 is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (63% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 6.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance (68% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (72% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.80% fail on Rbt
          • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.100% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.80% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.80% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.70% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.70% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.30% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.30% fail on Cable
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (66% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.50% fail on Pedal
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.100% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.100% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.100% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (65% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Transmission (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Joints
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system (71% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Driver's seat (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.90% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Hose (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.80% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.80% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.70% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
      • 0.30% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
      • 0.100% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.100% fail on Door condition
    • 0.30% fail on Chassis
      • 0.30% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.100% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.100% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.100% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.100% fail on Body
      • 0.100% fail on Other body component
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (55% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators (74% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Horn
      • 0.100% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (71% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 9.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (31% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Spark ignition (47% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.100% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.20% fail on Compression ignition (80% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.100% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.40% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.60% fail on View to rear
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.100% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.100% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.8% fail on Suspension (54% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms (45% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes (65% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.100% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.100% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.90% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.60% fail on Axles (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Axle
    • 0.40% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.30% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.100% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.30% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Coil spring (95% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.100% fail on Mounting
      • 0.100% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.100% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.20% fail on Anti-roll bars (96% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.100% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.100% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage components (94% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.100% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.20% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.100% fail on Steering play
      • 0.100% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
      • 0.100% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on Airbags
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.70% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages