MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » X-Trail » 2017

Nissan X-Trail MOT Results

Registered in 2017
84.5% pass rate
from 17,336 tests in 2021
(23% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan X-Trail is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.1% fail on Brakes (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums (48% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs (48% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Brake performance (31% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.058% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.017% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0058% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.098% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.092% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0058% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.098% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.098% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.075% fail on Brake performance not tested (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.052% fail on Rbt
          • 0.046% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0058% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.069% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.052% fail on Electronic parking brake (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.046% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.012% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0058% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.012% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0058% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0058% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.0058% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.0058% fail on Pedal
    • 0.0058% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0058% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0058% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (18% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers (44% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Washers (54% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.058% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.017% fail on View to rear
      • 0.012% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0058% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (23% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Size/type
  • 2.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.29% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (54% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamps (67% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.16% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.16% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.081% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.046% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.012% fail on Horn
    • 0.035% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (83% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0058% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0058% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.0058% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 1.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Catalyst emissions (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.0058% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0058% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.0058% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.71% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.012% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.023% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.023% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.58% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.092% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0058% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0058% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0058% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0058% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.0058% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.12% fail on Springs (64% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Coil springs (64% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Coil spring (64% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.029% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.0058% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0058% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 0.22% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.13% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.098% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0058% fail on Condition
  • 0.12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (61% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.023% fail on Transmission (77% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Joints (76% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Exhaust system (77% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Towbar (12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Other towbar components (19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Doors
      • 0.0058% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0058% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0058% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0058% fail on Door condition
    • 0.012% fail on Seats
      • 0.012% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.0058% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0058% fail on Pipe
    • 0.0058% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0058% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0058% fail on Body
      • 0.0058% fail on Panel
    • 0.0058% fail on Undertray
  • 0.046% fail on Steering (69% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.035% fail on Track rod end (62% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages