Nissan Tiida MOT Results

Registered in 2009

50.2% pass rate

from 410 tests in 2021

(31% worse than other 2009 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Tiida is unusually good or bad.

29% fail on Suspension (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 15% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 11% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.4% fail on Pins and bushes (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 13% fail on Springs (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 13% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 13% fail on Coil spring (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.73% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.73% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.24% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.24% fail on Ball joint
- 1.7% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.98% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.73% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.24% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
17% fail on Brakes (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Brake performance (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 4.6% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.24% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    - 0.24% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 4.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.2% fail on Rbt
      - 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.49% fail on Plate brake tester (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (59 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
- 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 2.7% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.49% fail on Hand lever
- 0.24% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.24% fail on Leaks
- 0.24% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.24% fail on Lever
15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.4% fail on Headlamp
- 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Horn (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.5% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.49% fail on Reversing lamps
  - 0.49% fail on Reversing lamps
8.8% fail on Visibility
- 5.1% fail on Wipers (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 0.49% fail on Bonnet
- 0.24% fail on View to rear
  - 0.24% fail on Mirrors
5.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Doors
  - 0.24% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.24% fail on Door condition
  - 0.24% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.24% fail on Door condition
- 0.24% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.24% fail on Transmission
  - 0.24% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.24% fail on Joints
- 0.24% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.24% fail on Engine mounting condition
5.9% fail on Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.98% fail on Condition
5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 5.4% fail on Spark ignition (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.24% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
0.49% fail on Steering (79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.24% fail on Track rod end
- 0.24% fail on Steering play
  - 0.24% fail on Steering rack
0.24% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.24% fail on Registration plates