MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Terrano » 2000

Nissan Terrano MOT Results

Registered in 2000
56.8% pass rate
from 162 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Terrano is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Integral vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.9% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
      • 0.62% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.62% fail on Joints
      • 0.62% fail on Halfshafts
    • 3.7% fail on Body (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Panel (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Body condition
      • 0.62% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 2.5% fail on Cabs (20 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Steps
    • 1.9% fail on Doors
      • 1.2% fail on Front passenger's door (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition
    • 0.62% fail on Chassis
      • 0.62% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on Pipe
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.62% fail on Switch
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.5% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.62% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.62% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 1.9% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.62% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.62% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.62% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.62% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.62% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.62% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.62% fail on Other braking system component
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.62% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.62% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 9.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 6.2% fail on Steering
    • 6.2% fail on Steering linkage components (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.62% fail on Steering play
      • 0.62% fail on Steering box
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Visibility
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.62% fail on View to rear
      • 0.62% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.62% fail on Wipers
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (86% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (85% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.62% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.62% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.62% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 0.62% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.62% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages