Nissan Murano MOT Results

Registered in 2005

54.0% pass rate

from 378 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Murano is unusually good or bad.

19% fail on Suspension
- 9.8% fail on Suspension arms (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 6.9% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 9.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 4.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.26% fail on Anti-roll bar
  - 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.26% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.53% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.53% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.53% fail on Coil spring (89% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
  - 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.26% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint
- 0.26% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.53% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.4% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.79% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.53% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.53% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.26% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.26% fail on Horn
- 0.26% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.26% fail on Position lamp
12% fail on Brakes
- 6.1% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.4% fail on Rbt
      - 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 1.3% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.79% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 4.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 4.8% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.79% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.79% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.79% fail on Lever
- 0.53% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.26% fail on Pedal
  - 0.26% fail on Hand lever
- 0.26% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
9.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.9% fail on Transmission
  - 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
    - 2.6% fail on Joints
    - 0.26% fail on Drive shaft
  - 0.26% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.26% fail on Prop shaft
  - 0.26% fail on Belts
- 1.3% fail on Seats (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Driver's seat (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Doors
  - 0.53% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.53% fail on Door condition
  - 0.26% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.26% fail on Door condition
  - 0.26% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.26% fail on Door condition
- 0.53% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.26% fail on Tank
  - 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
    - 0.26% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.26% fail on Bumpers
- 0.26% fail on Body
  - 0.26% fail on Other body component
9.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 7.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 7.9% fail on Spark ignition
    - 5.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 2.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.26% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.26% fail on Oxygen sensor
    - 0.26% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Other leaks
7.4% fail on Steering (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Steering linkage components (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 6.1% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Power steering
  - 0.79% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.26% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.26% fail on Operation
5.8% fail on Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Washers
- 1.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.53% fail on View to rear
  - 0.53% fail on Mirrors
4.0% fail on Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.53% fail on Size/type
2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.79% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.53% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.26% fail on Condition
1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates