Mitsubishi Space Wagon MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.8% pass rate
from 91 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 7.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.2% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.5% fail on Transmission
      • 5.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.5% fail on Joints
    • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame
        • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.2% fail on Chassis
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Seats (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Passenger's seat (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Spare wheel
      • 1.1% fail on Carrier
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.1% fail on Other braking system component
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.1% fail on Cable
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.2% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 3.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages