MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 2010

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2010
67.2% pass rate
from 1,159 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp levelling device (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Direction indicators (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Flashing type (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.17% fail on Individual direction indicators (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.69% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.26% fail on Trailer electrical socket (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Horn
      • 0.086% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.26% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.086% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.086% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.086% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.78% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.69% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.7% fail on Springs (32% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Coil springs (32% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Coil spring (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.086% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.086% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.086% fail on Sub-frame
  • 11% fail on Brakes (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.086% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.35% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt
          • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.086% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.086% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs and drums (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Brake discs (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.086% fail on Lever
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.69% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.60% fail on Electronic stability control (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.26% fail on Lever
    • 0.26% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.086% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.086% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.086% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.086% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.086% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.086% fail on Other components
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.086% fail on View to rear
      • 0.086% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.5% fail on Steering (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Steering linkage components (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.86% fail on Steering gear (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Steering rack (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Other components (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Rams
    • 0.086% fail on Steering play
      • 0.086% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.43% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Tank (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Chassis (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Chassis condition (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Transmission (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Joints (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.17% fail on Body
      • 0.086% fail on Panel
      • 0.086% fail on Other body component
    • 0.086% fail on Towbar
      • 0.086% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.086% fail on Seats
      • 0.086% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.086% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.086% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.69% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.086% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.35% fail on Spark ignition (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.26% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.086% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.95% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.60% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.086% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.086% fail on Airbags
      • 0.086% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.086% fail on Condition
    • 0.086% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.

    Search Good Garages