MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Outlander » 2017

Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results

Registered in 2017
86.2% pass rate
from 9,049 tests in 2021
(9.1% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.9% fail on Visibility (34% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (69% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Washers (54% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.088% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.011% fail on Window
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Condition (32% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (23% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Brakes (28% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (28% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (36% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (35% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.36% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.36% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.80% fail on Brake performance (65% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (84% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (79% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.022% fail on Decelerometer (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake performance (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.055% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.055% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.044% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.011% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.033% fail on Rbt
          • 0.033% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.011% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.011% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.055% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.044% fail on Lever
      • 0.011% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.055% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.011% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.011% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.011% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.011% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.011% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 2.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.91% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.18% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.055% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.11% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.044% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.022% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.022% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.033% fail on Stop lamp (90% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.011% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.011% fail on Position lamp
  • 0.53% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes (35 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.055% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.077% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.055% fail on Axles (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Axle (158 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Springs (87% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Coil springs (87% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Coil spring (87% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.011% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.011% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.50% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.35% fail on Compression ignition (65% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Spark ignition (65% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.022% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.022% fail on Undertray (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.38% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.066% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.055% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.044% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.011% fail on Pipe
    • 0.055% fail on Undertray (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.044% fail on Transmission
      • 0.033% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.033% fail on Joints
      • 0.011% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.011% fail on Joints
    • 0.044% fail on Body
      • 0.022% fail on Panel
      • 0.022% fail on Other body component
    • 0.033% fail on Seats
      • 0.033% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.022% fail on Spare wheel (13 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Spare wheel condition (22 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Doors
      • 0.011% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.011% fail on Door condition
      • 0.011% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.011% fail on Door condition
  • 0.22% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.22% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Requirements
  • 0.13% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.13% fail on Steering
    • 0.088% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.077% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.011% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.011% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.011% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.011% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.011% fail on Steering play
      • 0.011% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.011% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages