MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » FTO » 1995

Mitsubishi FTO MOT Results

Registered in 1995
45.5% pass rate
from 22 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi FTO is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Suspension (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 32% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 18% fail on Anti-roll bars (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (27 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.5% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 32% fail on Brakes (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 27% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 18% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 9.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 9.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 18% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 18% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 14% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 9.1% fail on Rbt
          • 9.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 4.5% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt
          • 4.5% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 9.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 9.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 9.1% fail on Brake discs (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 4.5% fail on Hand lever
  • 18% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 9.1% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Steering play
      • 4.5% fail on Steering box
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 14% fail on Headlamps (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 14% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 9.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 9.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.5% fail on Chassis
      • 4.5% fail on Chassis condition
  • 14% fail on Visibility
    • 9.1% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages