MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2008

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2008
60.5% pass rate
from 167 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Horn
    • 0.60% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.60% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.60% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.60% fail on Switch
    • 0.60% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 7.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt
          • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 3.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 3.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.60% fail on Pedal
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.60% fail on Lever
    • 0.60% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.60% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.60% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.60% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 12% fail on Tyres (84% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Tread depth (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Washers
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.60% fail on View to rear
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Axles (22 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on King pins (4013 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (25 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Springs (80% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs (1002 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.60% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.60% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.60% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Fuel system (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Tank (30 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Bumpers (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Seats (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Driver's seat (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.60% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.60% fail on Transmission
      • 0.60% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.60% fail on Joints
    • 0.60% fail on Body
      • 0.60% fail on Other body component
    • 0.60% fail on Doors
      • 0.60% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.60% fail on Door condition
    • 0.60% fail on Cabs
      • 0.60% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.2% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.60% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 6.0% fail on Steering
    • 6.0% fail on Steering linkage components (200% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.8% fail on Drag link end (46 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Steering play
      • 0.60% fail on Steering box
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages