MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » MINI » 1000 » 1995

MINI 1000 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
64.1% pass rate
from 820 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the MINI 1000 is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.73% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (71% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (73% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.12% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.49% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.49% fail on Horn
      • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.49% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.12% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.37% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.37% fail on Switch
    • 0.12% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Position lamp
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (91% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.37% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.24% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.61% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.61% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (18 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.12% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.12% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension unit
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance (37% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (62% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (73% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (74% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (59% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.98% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Pivot (30 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.12% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.12% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.12% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.12% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.12% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (55% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Washers (75% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Seats (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Chassis
      • 0.85% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.73% fail on Floor (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.49% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.24% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
  • 7.1% fail on Steering (66% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.37% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.12% fail on Steering column
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
      • 0.12% fail on Pre-tensioners
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres
    • 0.98% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.73% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.24% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.24% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages