MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mercedes-Benz » A-Class » 2009

Mercedes-Benz A-Class MOT Results

Registered in 2009
66.2% pass rate
from 7,947 tests in 2021
(14% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz A-Class is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (10% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.013% fail on Switch
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.088% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.013% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Stop lamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.013% fail on Switch
    • 0.050% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Rear fog lamp (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.050% fail on Rear fog lamp (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (15% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.013% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (40% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (42% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt
          • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.013% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.013% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.013% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.013% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs and drums (31% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Brake discs (31% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Cable
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.54% fail on Lever (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Hand lever (79% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Pedal (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.088% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.013% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.025% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.025% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.025% fail on Other components
    • 0.013% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.013% fail on Leaks
  • 8.1% fail on Suspension (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Springs (21% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Coil springs (21% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Coil spring (20% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Pins and bushes (97% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Linkage ball joints (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint dust cover (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Linkage (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Macpherson strut (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.013% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.038% fail on Sub-frames (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Sub-frame (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Washers (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers (27% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on View to rear (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Mirrors (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.013% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (19% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Joints (37% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
    • 0.42% fail on Exhaust system (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Hose (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Tank
    • 0.23% fail on Engine mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Bracket (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.063% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition
      • 0.050% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition
      • 0.025% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.025% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.038% fail on Seats
      • 0.025% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.013% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.038% fail on Undertray
    • 0.025% fail on Body
      • 0.013% fail on Body condition
      • 0.013% fail on Other body component
    • 0.013% fail on Load security
      • 0.013% fail on Access panel
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (36% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.31% fail on Catalyst emissions (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition (26% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.076% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.025% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.025% fail on Fluid leaks (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.013% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.72% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.59% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Requirements
  • 0.39% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.013% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Operation
    • 0.050% fail on Steering play
      • 0.050% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.013% fail on Power steering
      • 0.013% fail on Operation
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 0.29% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages