Mazda Premacy MOT Results

Registered in 2002
45.7% pass rate
from 70 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda Premacy is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Suspension (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 20% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 4.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 2.9% fail on Electronic stability control (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.4% fail on Reservoirs
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 10% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment
    • 4.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 7.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 8.6% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
  • 5.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's seat
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp

Search Good Garages