MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mazda » B-Class » 2003

Mazda B-Class MOT Results

Registered in 2003
52.0% pass rate
from 377 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mazda B-Class is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (55% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim (81% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim (87% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.80% fail on Horn
      • 0.27% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.27% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.27% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.27% fail on Switch
    • 0.27% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.27% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Transmission (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Prop shafts (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Prop shaft (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.1% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Body (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Body condition (63 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Mounting fixings (52 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Panel
      • 0.27% fail on Other body component
    • 1.6% fail on Bumpers (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Cabs (19 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (21 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.80% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Towbar (42 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Other towbar components (62 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.80% fail on Floor (23 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 7.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.27% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.27% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.2% fail on Load sensing valves (17 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.27% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.80% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.80% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.27% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.53% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
        • 0.27% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 4.5% fail on Springs
      • 4.2% fail on Leaf springs (676 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Leaf spring (951 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (739 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.27% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.80% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.53% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.53% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.27% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
  • 5.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.27% fail on Other emission control equipment
    • 0.53% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.53% fail on Other leaks (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.80% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.27% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.27% fail on Steering box
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.27% fail on Steering play
      • 0.27% fail on Steering box
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.53% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages