MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » LTI » TX4 » 2009

LTI TX4 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
61.4% pass rate
from 1,744 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the LTI TX4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 9.2% fail on Suspension arms (97% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (32% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bar (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.2% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Coil spring (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.057% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.057% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.057% fail on Torsion bar
      • 0.057% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.75% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.52% fail on Suspension rods (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes (28 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.29% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.057% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.17% fail on Axles
      • 0.17% fail on Axle (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.057% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.057% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.057% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.97% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Horn
      • 0.057% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.11% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 12% fail on Brakes (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Brake performance (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.057% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (40% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pedal (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake linings and pads (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Brake pads (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums (55% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Brake discs (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Servos
      • 0.057% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.057% fail on Valves
    • 0.29% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Servos (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 8.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.057% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.057% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Fluid leaks (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Engine oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Transmission oil leaks (35 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Other leaks (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 8.4% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Drag link end (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Locking devices (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Other components (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Steering linkage (57 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Intermediate drop arm (199 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Lock stop (288 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.52% fail on Steering box (229 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Pump (88 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.057% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering column (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering box (95 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Washers (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear
      • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.8% fail on Transmission
      • 1.8% fail on Prop shafts (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Prop shaft (55 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Joints (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Bearing housing (88 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Flexible couplings (43 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Engine mounting (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Bracket (28 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.40% fail on Chassis (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.34% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
    • 0.29% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.29% fail on Cabs (75 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (95 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Catch (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Door condition
      • 0.057% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.057% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.057% fail on Body condition
      • 0.057% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.057% fail on Load security
      • 0.057% fail on Loading door
    • 0.057% fail on Floor
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Size/type
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (93% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 0.057% fail on Condition
  • 0.11% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Speedometer (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belt installation check (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.057% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages