MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Range Rover Sport » 2010

Land Rover Range Rover Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.1% pass rate
from 6,688 tests in 2021
(33% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.7% fail on Brakes
    • 3.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.015% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs and drums (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Brake discs (37% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.045% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.045% fail on Cable
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (78% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.030% fail on Service brake imbalance (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Decelerometer (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.030% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.015% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.030% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.015% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.045% fail on Service brake imbalance (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Electronic parking brake (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
      • 0.030% fail on Hand lever (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.060% fail on Anti-lock braking system (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.090% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.075% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.015% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.045% fail on Air and vacuum systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Servos (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Operation
    • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.015% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.015% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.015% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
  • 7.2% fail on Suspension (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage ball joints (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Linkage (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.030% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.72% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (56 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Operation (61 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes (104 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Suspension unit (41 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Other components (99 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Accumulator (95 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Bellows (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Levelling valve (42 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Suspension rods (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.045% fail on Other suspension component (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.015% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.015% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.015% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Headlamps (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.015% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.43% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
      • 0.060% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.015% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.21% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Individual direction indicators (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.015% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.015% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.015% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.015% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints
        • 0.015% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 1.1% fail on Prop shafts (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Prop shaft (60 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Bearing housing (62 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Flexible couplings (42 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Joints
    • 0.34% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.030% fail on Pipe
      • 0.030% fail on System
      • 0.015% fail on Hose
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.075% fail on Door condition
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.090% fail on Other body component
      • 0.015% fail on Body condition
    • 0.075% fail on Cabs (36 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Steps (240 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.030% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.015% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.015% fail on Carrier
    • 0.030% fail on Undertray
    • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.015% fail on Chassis
      • 0.015% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.015% fail on Floor
    • 0.015% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.015% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 2.6% fail on Visibility (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Wipers (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.090% fail on View to rear
      • 0.090% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.64% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.090% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.015% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.015% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.015% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.22% fail on Spark ignition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.015% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.015% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.015% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.075% fail on Other leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Steering linkage components (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.045% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.015% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.015% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.015% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Operation
      • 0.045% fail on Other components
      • 0.015% fail on Rams
    • 0.19% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.10% fail on Operation (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Steering rack (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Steering play
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.030% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.015% fail on Steering column
    • 0.015% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.015% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.84% fail on Identification of the vehicle (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Registration plates (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.84% fail on Road Wheels (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Attachment (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.58% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
      • 0.015% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Airbags
      • 0.030% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.015% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.030% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Steps and stairs (160 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Steps (160 times worse than other 2010 cars)

Search Good Garages