Land Rover Range Rover Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2009
72.2% pass rate
from 5,551 tests in 2021
(28% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.2% fail on Brakes
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums (49% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Brake discs (50% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.6% fail on Brake performance (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Rbt (69% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake imbalance (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.61% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (77% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Decelerometer (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.054% fail on Parking brake performance (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake imbalance (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Parking brake control (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Electronic parking brake (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.054% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.27% fail on Flexible brake hoses (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
      • 0.018% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.090% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.072% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.018% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.036% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.018% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.018% fail on Valves
  • 9.1% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.054% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (56% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage ball joints (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint dust cover (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (78 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Operation (73 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Suspension unit (68 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Other components (167 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pipes (117 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Bellows (39 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Levelling valve (39 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Accumulator (135 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.090% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.036% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.072% fail on Shock absorbers (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.018% fail on Axles
      • 0.018% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.018% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 7.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (48% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Headlamps (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.68% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.25% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.18% fail on Horn
      • 0.036% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.018% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.018% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.054% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.054% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.018% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.018% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres (14% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Transmission (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Prop shaft (66 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Bearing housing (76 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Flexible couplings (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.018% fail on Pipe
      • 0.018% fail on System
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust system (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Body
      • 0.13% fail on Other body component
      • 0.036% fail on Mounting fixings (33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Panel
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.036% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.036% fail on Door condition
      • 0.018% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.018% fail on Door condition
    • 0.054% fail on Cabs (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Steps (80 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Seats
      • 0.018% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.018% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.018% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.018% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.018% fail on Bumpers
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (38% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.054% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.036% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.018% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.018% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.036% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.52% fail on Spark ignition (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.018% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.072% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.018% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.018% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 2.4% fail on Visibility (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Wipers (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.054% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.054% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.054% fail on View to rear
      • 0.054% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Attachment (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.0% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.036% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.018% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.018% fail on Other components
        • 0.018% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.29% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering gear (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.018% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.018% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.79% fail on Identification of the vehicle (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plates (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.58% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (46% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Requirements
      • 0.018% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (53% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.018% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.018% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.018% fail on Steps

Search Good Garages