Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 2016
83.8% pass rate
from 5,899 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.4% fail on Tyres (37% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Tread depth (59% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.25% fail on Washers (77% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.051% fail on View to rear
      • 0.051% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.034% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.2% fail on Brakes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.41% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (25 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Brake performance (70% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.051% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.051% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.034% fail on Service brake performance (92% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Rbt (92% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake performance (90% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 0.085% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.085% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.017% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
    • 0.034% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.017% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.017% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.017% fail on Pedal
    • 0.017% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.017% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.017% fail on Additional braking device
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.085% fail on Condition
      • 0.017% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.068% fail on Airbags (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Drivers airbag (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (55% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Compression ignition (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.034% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.46% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.017% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.068% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Other leaks (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (66% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.44% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Flashing type (81% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.034% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.068% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.051% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Horn
    • 0.051% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (85% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.034% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (82% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.017% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.017% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 1.2% fail on Suspension (43% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Suspension arms (65% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint (74% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.034% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.017% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.051% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.051% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.034% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.017% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.017% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.017% fail on Operation
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.73% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.46% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.034% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.034% fail on Joints
    • 0.085% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.068% fail on Body
      • 0.051% fail on Other body component
      • 0.017% fail on Panel
    • 0.051% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.051% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.034% fail on Seats
      • 0.034% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.017% fail on Towbar
      • 0.017% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.017% fail on Doors
      • 0.017% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.017% fail on Door condition
    • 0.017% fail on Cabs
      • 0.017% fail on Steps
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.034% fail on Condition
  • 0.12% fail on Steering
    • 0.051% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.051% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.034% fail on Steering linkage components (84% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.017% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.034% fail on Steering column

Search Good Garages