Land Rover Range Rover MOT Results

Registered in 1996

68.5% pass rate

from 702 tests in 2021

(13% better than other 1996 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Range Rover is unusually good or bad.

12% fail on Brakes
- 6.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 6.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.43% fail on Electronic stability control (8 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Electronic braking system
- 5.0% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 1.00% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.85% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 1996 cars)
      - 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance (84% better than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      - 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.85% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.57% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.28% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (15 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.85% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 1996 cars)
      - 0.85% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      - 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.00% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.43% fail on Decelerometer (15 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      - 0.28% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (13 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      - 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.6% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.00% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.00% fail on Brake discs
- 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.43% fail on Pedal
- 0.43% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.43% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.14% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.14% fail on Servos
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.14% fail on Lever
- 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.14% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
    - 0.14% fail on Other braking system component
10% fail on Suspension
- 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
  - 3.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.71% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.71% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.57% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.14% fail on Linkage
  - 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.0% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.85% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.43% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.28% fail on Bellows (48 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Operation
- 0.28% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (94% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Axles
  - 0.14% fail on Axle
9.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.3% fail on Transmission
  - 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
    - 2.4% fail on Joints
  - 0.85% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.71% fail on Joints
    - 0.14% fail on Prop shaft
- 1.3% fail on Doors
  - 0.85% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.85% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.43% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.43% fail on Door condition
  - 0.14% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.14% fail on Door condition
- 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.71% fail on Seats
  - 0.43% fail on Driver's seat
  - 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.57% fail on Chassis
  - 0.57% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.57% fail on Body
  - 0.43% fail on Other body component
  - 0.14% fail on Panel
- 0.28% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.28% fail on Tank
- 0.28% fail on Bumpers
- 0.14% fail on Floor
9.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% better than other 1996 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.6% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (58% better than other 1996 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Headlamp
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.71% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.43% fail on Electrical wiring
  - 0.14% fail on Horn
- 1.00% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.00% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.85% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.85% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.14% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.14% fail on Position lamp
7.8% fail on Steering (91% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 5.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Drag link end (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Other components
    - 0.14% fail on Steering component
- 0.43% fail on Power steering
  - 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
  - 0.14% fail on Other components
7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 5.7% fail on Spark ignition
    - 4.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.14% fail on Catalytic converter
  - 0.85% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.43% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    - 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.14% fail on Catalytic converter
    - 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    - 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.85% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.71% fail on Other leaks (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.28% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  - 0.14% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
6.7% fail on Visibility
- 3.6% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 0.71% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.14% fail on Windscreen
- 0.14% fail on View to rear
  - 0.14% fail on Mirrors
6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (52% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 4.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Seat belts
  - 1.6% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 1996 cars)
2.1% fail on Tyres
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.85% fail on Condition
0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.85% fail on Registration plates
0.28% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.28% fail on Attachment