MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Land Rover » Freelander » 2009

Land Rover Freelander MOT Results

Registered in 2009
70.8% pass rate
from 10,605 tests in 2021
(26% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Freelander is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.0% fail on Suspension (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Springs (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Coil springs (47% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Coil spring (47% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (38% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage
      • 0.057% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.028% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.019% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0094% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.21% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.094% fail on Sub-frames (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Sub-frame (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0094% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.057% fail on Macpherson strut (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0094% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0094% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.028% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.028% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0094% fail on Axles
      • 0.0094% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 8.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (22% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (29% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (27% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Headlamp levelling device (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Direction indicators (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Flashing type (59% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Individual direction indicators (38% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Side repeaters (93% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (35% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Battery(ies) (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.075% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.028% fail on Position lamps (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Position lamp (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.0094% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0094% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.0094% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0094% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.0094% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes
    • 6.0% fail on Brake performance (27% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (28 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.085% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.057% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake performance (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Plate brake tester (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.028% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.76% fail on Service brake performance (69% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (74% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake imbalance (96% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (59% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance (74% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.075% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.0094% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs and drums (23% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Brake discs (24% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Cable (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Lever
        • 0.0094% fail on Linkage
    • 0.36% fail on Flexible brake hoses (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.32% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.057% fail on Pedal
    • 0.19% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Electronic stability control (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Rigid brake pipes (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic systems (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.019% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.019% fail on Other components
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (37% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Visibility (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers (37% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.085% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.085% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.028% fail on Bonnet (82% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components (29% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (30% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.019% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0094% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0094% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0094% fail on Other components
        • 0.0094% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.67% fail on Steering gear (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Steering rack (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Other components
    • 0.057% fail on Steering play
      • 0.057% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0094% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0094% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0094% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Transmission (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Drive shafts (70% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Joints (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.028% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.019% fail on Prop shafts (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Joints
    • 0.51% fail on Doors (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
      • 0.075% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.075% fail on Door condition
    • 0.27% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0094% fail on Pipe
    • 0.066% fail on Body
      • 0.066% fail on Other body component
    • 0.038% fail on Chassis
      • 0.038% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.038% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Other towbar components (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Coupling
    • 0.038% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.038% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.019% fail on Integral vehicle structure (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.0094% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0094% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.019% fail on Bumpers (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Cabs
      • 0.0094% fail on Steps
      • 0.0094% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.0094% fail on Seats
      • 0.0094% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Compression ignition (33% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.028% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.019% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.13% fail on Spark ignition (95% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.0094% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.028% fail on Fluid leaks (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.0094% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0094% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0094% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.019% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.019% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.40% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Seat belts (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.038% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0094% fail on Condition
  • 0.25% fail on Identification of the vehicle (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plates (45% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.0094% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.0094% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages