Land Rover Discovery MOT Results

Registered in 1990

74.6% pass rate

from 114 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Land Rover Discovery is unusually good or bad.

13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.88% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.5% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 3.5% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.6% fail on Headlamp
- 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.6% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.8% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.88% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.88% fail on Rear reflectors
9.6% fail on Suspension
- 3.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.6% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other 1990 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1990 cars)
  - 0.88% fail on Axle
- 1.8% fail on Suspension rods (10 times worse than other 1990 cars)
  - 0.88% fail on Suspension rod
  - 0.88% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.88% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.88% fail on Springs
  - 0.88% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 0.88% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.88% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.88% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.88% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.88% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
9.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 2.6% fail on Body (7 times worse than other 1990 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Mounting fixings (48 times worse than other 1990 cars)
  - 0.88% fail on Body condition
- 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.8% fail on Doors
  - 0.88% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.88% fail on Door condition
  - 0.88% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.88% fail on Door condition
- 0.88% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.88% fail on Pipe
- 0.88% fail on Transmission
  - 0.88% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.88% fail on Joints
- 0.88% fail on Seats
  - 0.88% fail on Driver's seat
7.0% fail on Steering
- 3.5% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 3.5% fail on Track rod end
  - 1.8% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
  - 0.88% fail on Ball joint
- 2.6% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 1990 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Pipes and hoses (13 times worse than other 1990 cars)
  - 0.88% fail on Pump
- 1.8% fail on Steering gear
  - 1.8% fail on Steering box (18 times worse than other 1990 cars)
6.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 1990 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other 1990 cars)
  - 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 1.8% fail on Condition
  - 0.88% fail on Requirements
4.4% fail on Visibility
- 2.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.6% fail on Spark ignition
    - 2.6% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  - 0.88% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.88% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
2.6% fail on Brakes (73% better than other 1990 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.88% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.88% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.88% fail on Servos
- 0.88% fail on Flexible brake hoses
1.8% fail on Tyres
- 0.88% fail on Condition
- 0.88% fail on Tread depth