Kia Carens MOT Results
Registered in 200242.3% pass rate
from 26 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Kia Carens is unusually good or bad.
-
42% fail on
Brakes
(200% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
42% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
31% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 31% fail on Rbt (sp) (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
15% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 12% fail on Service brake imbalance (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
7.7% fail on
Rbt
- 7.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
7.7% fail on
Rbt
- 3.8% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
-
31% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.8% fail on Brake pads
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
42% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
23% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
15% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
15% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 15% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
15% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.8% fail on
Doors
-
3.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 3.8% fail on Door condition
-
3.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
15% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
- 12% fail on Headlamp
-
7.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 3.8% fail on Battery(ies)
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
7.7% fail on
Springs
-
7.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.8% fail on Coil spring
- 3.8% fail on Mounting
-
7.7% fail on
Coil springs
-
7.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.8% fail on Ball joint
- 3.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension rods
- 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.8% fail on
Sub-frames
- 3.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
7.7% fail on
Springs
-
7.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (17 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 3.8% fail on Registration plates
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
-
3.8% fail on
Steering play
- 3.8% fail on Steering rack
-
3.8% fail on
Steering play
-
3.8% fail on
Visibility
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 3.8% fail on Washers
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.8% fail on Condition
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth