Jeep Grand Cherokee MOT Results

Registered in 2002
56.8% pass rate
from 463 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Jeep Grand Cherokee is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (21 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.22% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.65% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (20 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
    • 6.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (93% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads (94% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.43% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Lever (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.86% fail on Lever
    • 0.65% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.65% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.43% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.22% fail on Pressure storage reservoirs
      • 0.22% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.86% fail on Horn
      • 0.22% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.86% fail on Rear reflectors (17 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.43% fail on Main beam tell-tale (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.65% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.65% fail on Springs (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.22% fail on Mounting
    • 0.65% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Axles
      • 0.43% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.43% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension rod
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Joints
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.86% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.65% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.43% fail on Body
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
      • 0.22% fail on Other body component
    • 0.22% fail on Chassis
      • 0.22% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Cabs
      • 0.22% fail on Cab condition
  • 6.5% fail on Steering
    • 5.4% fail on Steering linkage components (87% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.86% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.86% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
      • 0.22% fail on Pump
    • 0.43% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.43% fail on Operation (22 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering box
    • 0.22% fail on Steering play
      • 0.22% fail on Steering box
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.86% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.86% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.43% fail on Transmission oil leaks (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 5.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Airbags
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.86% fail on Washers (76% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on View to rear
      • 0.43% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages