Jaguar XKR MOT Results

Registered in 2009
79.2% pass rate
from 665 tests in 2021
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar XKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Suspension (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Springs (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Coil spring (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Suspension rods (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover (30 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.30% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.30% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.90% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.60% fail on Headlamps (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.45% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.15% fail on Horn
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt (81% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.90% fail on Mechanical brake components (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.75% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.15% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.15% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 2.7% fail on Visibility (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.45% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.15% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.15% fail on NOx sensor
  • 0.75% fail on Steering (68% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.75% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.45% fail on Body, chassis, structure (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Engine mounting (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.45% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages