Jaguar X-Type MOT Results

Registered in 2010

66.7% pass rate

from 207 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar X-Type is unusually good or bad.

16% fail on Suspension
- 7.7% fail on Springs
  - 7.7% fail on Coil springs
    - 7.7% fail on Coil spring
- 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.97% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.48% fail on Linkage
- 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.48% fail on Suspension arm
- 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.48% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
9.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.97% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.97% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.97% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.97% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.97% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.97% fail on Rear fog lamp
6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 5.8% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 3.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.97% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (39 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.97% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.48% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
6.3% fail on Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.48% fail on Size/type
5.8% fail on Brakes
- 2.9% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.9% fail on Rbt
      - 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.48% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.97% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.97% fail on Rbt
      - 0.97% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.97% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.97% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.97% fail on Brake pads
    - 0.48% fail on Brake linings
  - 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.4% fail on Brake discs
- 0.97% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.97% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
2.4% fail on Visibility
- 1.4% fail on Washers
- 0.97% fail on Wipers
2.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Transmission
  - 0.48% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.48% fail on Joints
- 0.48% fail on Undertray
1.4% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.97% fail on Attachment
- 0.48% fail on Condition
0.97% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.97% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.48% fail on Condition
0.48% fail on Steering
- 0.48% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.48% fail on Track rod end