MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Jaguar » X-Type » 2009

Jaguar X-Type MOT Results

Registered in 2009
66.1% pass rate
from 5,204 tests in 2021
(13% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Jaguar X-Type is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 5.1% fail on Springs
      • 5.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.0% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.096% fail on Mounting
      • 0.077% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms (37% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.60% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (37% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Linkage ball joints (32% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bar (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage
      • 0.096% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.019% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.058% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.077% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.058% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.019% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.019% fail on Axles
      • 0.019% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 9.4% fail on Brakes
    • 4.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (40% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.096% fail on Plate brake tester (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.019% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (41% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.019% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.019% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.38% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.38% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.019% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.019% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.17% fail on Cable
        • 0.058% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake fluid (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Valves
      • 0.019% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.44% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.44% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.038% fail on Electronic stability control (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
      • 0.077% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.096% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.019% fail on Leaks
  • 8.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.019% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (28% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (28% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.61% fail on Individual direction indicators (49% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.077% fail on Horn
      • 0.019% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.038% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.038% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.019% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.019% fail on Switch
    • 0.019% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (40% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.019% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.019% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.019% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.42% fail on Spark ignition (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.019% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.096% fail on Fluid leaks (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Engine oil leaks (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.038% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.038% fail on Undertray
  • 4.2% fail on Visibility (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.038% fail on View to rear
      • 0.038% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.019% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.019% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission (34% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (33% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (34% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.019% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.038% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.038% fail on Joints
    • 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.077% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.077% fail on Door condition
      • 0.077% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.077% fail on Door condition
      • 0.077% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.077% fail on Door condition
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.077% fail on Tank
      • 0.077% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.038% fail on Pipe
    • 0.15% fail on Exhaust system (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Seats
      • 0.077% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.038% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.038% fail on Undertray
    • 0.019% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.019% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.019% fail on Body
      • 0.019% fail on Other body component
    • 0.019% fail on Floor
    • 0.019% fail on Cabs
      • 0.019% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.019% fail on Requirements
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.058% fail on Vehicle Identification Number (50 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.33% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.019% fail on Operation
    • 0.096% fail on Steering linkage components (95% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Track rod end (95% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Steering play
      • 0.038% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages