Hyundai Tucson MOT Results

Registered in 2015
81.7% pass rate
from 5,000 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.1% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (62% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (89% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (89% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.40% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.020% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.020% fail on Lever
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (48 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.080% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.020% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (64% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (67% better than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.080% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.060% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Lever (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Electronic parking brake (19 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Hand lever (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal
    • 0.040% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.040% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.040% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.020% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Visibility
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.82% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.080% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.020% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.040% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.88% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.84% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.22% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.080% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (85% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.080% fail on Trailer electrical socket (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Direction indicators (86% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Flashing type (86% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Side repeaters (80% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.020% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.020% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.020% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 1.5% fail on Suspension (54% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.040% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.10% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.060% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.020% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 0.62% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (46% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Exhaust emissions (46% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.060% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.18% fail on Spark ignition (72% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.020% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.020% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.58% fail on Body, chassis, structure (38% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Other passenger's door (13 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Door condition (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.040% fail on Door condition
      • 0.020% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition
    • 0.060% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.040% fail on Transmission (90% better than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Drive shafts (89% better than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Joints (89% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.020% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.020% fail on Tank
    • 0.020% fail on Undertray
  • 0.46% fail on Steering
    • 0.44% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.44% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.020% fail on Power steering
      • 0.020% fail on Operation
  • 0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (63% better than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.080% fail on Condition
      • 0.040% fail on Requirements
    • 0.020% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages