MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Tucson » 2010

Hyundai Tucson MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.5% pass rate
from 333 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Tucson is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.60% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.90% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.90% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.30% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.30% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.30% fail on Lever
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.90% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.60% fail on Lever
    • 0.60% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake fluid (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.3% fail on Springs
      • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.90% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.90% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.60% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.30% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.30% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.30% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.30% fail on Sub-frame
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.60% fail on Stop lamp (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.60% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.60% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 7.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.60% fail on Doors
      • 0.60% fail on Other passenger's door (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on System
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.30% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.60% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.30% fail on Steering box
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.30% fail on Rams
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.90% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.30% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages