Hyundai Terracan MOT Results

Registered in 2006
51.0% pass rate
from 461 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Terracan is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (88% worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 8.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (71% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.22% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.22% fail on Cable
    • 5.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.65% fail on Pedal
    • 0.43% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.43% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (87% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (22 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.5% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (27 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.9% fail on Springs
      • 2.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.4% fail on Coil spring (53% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Mounting (15 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (37 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.22% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.65% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.65% fail on Electrical wiring (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.43% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
  • 11% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 10% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drag link end (16 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Intermediate drop arm (302 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
        • 0.22% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.43% fail on Steering play
      • 0.43% fail on Steering box (130 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.22% fail on Steering box
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Joints
        • 0.22% fail on Drive shaft
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Tank (13 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.43% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.22% fail on Towbar
      • 0.22% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.22% fail on Body
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.87% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2006 cars)
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition (120% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.22% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages