Hyundai Terracan MOT Results

Registered in 2005

58.5% pass rate

from 702 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Terracan is unusually good or bad.

20% fail on Brakes (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 14% fail on Brake performance (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 8.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 2.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.3% fail on Rbt
      - 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.14% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 3.0% fail on Rbt (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.57% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.14% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    - 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 0.57% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.57% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (87% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 3.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Electronic braking system
- 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.8% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.71% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.71% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.14% fail on Lever
- 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.28% fail on Hand lever
  - 0.14% fail on Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.28% fail on Lever
- 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.4% fail on Headlamps
  - 5.3% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.71% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.28% fail on Horn
- 0.57% fail on Direction indicators (78% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.57% fail on Flashing type (78% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.57% fail on Individual direction indicators
15% fail on Suspension
- 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 1.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.71% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.28% fail on Anti-roll bar
  - 0.28% fail on Linkage
  - 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.14% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 5.4% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.4% fail on Suspension arm (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.9% fail on Springs (60% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Coil springs (69% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 1.3% fail on Coil spring (72% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.14% fail on Mounting
  - 0.57% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.14% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
9.4% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Steering linkage components (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 7.1% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.57% fail on Intermediate drop arm (145 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.43% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Other components
    - 0.14% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.71% fail on Power steering
  - 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Operation
  - 0.14% fail on Other components
- 0.14% fail on Steering play
  - 0.14% fail on Steering box
7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.6% fail on Transmission (56% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (58% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 1.4% fail on Joints (57% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.14% fail on Joints
- 1.4% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Tank (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on System
- 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.85% fail on Chassis
  - 0.85% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.28% fail on Bumpers
- 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
  - 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.14% fail on Body
  - 0.14% fail on Other body component
- 0.14% fail on Seats
  - 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.14% fail on Cabs
  - 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.14% fail on Undertray
5.0% fail on Visibility (34% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Washers
- 1.9% fail on Wipers (51% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.14% fail on Windscreen
3.3% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.57% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2005 cars)
2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.14% fail on Airbags
  - 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag
  - 0.14% fail on Passengers airbag
2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% better than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    - 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.14% fail on NOx sensor
    - 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  - 0.28% fail on Spark ignition (94% better than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.57% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  - 0.14% fail on Other leaks
0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.57% fail on Registration plates
0.28% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.28% fail on Attachment