MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Terracan » 2003

Hyundai Terracan MOT Results

Registered in 2003
53.0% pass rate
from 219 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Terracan is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (84% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 3.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.46% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 3.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.46% fail on Pedal
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.46% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.5% fail on Springs
      • 5.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.0% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.46% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.91% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.91% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.46% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.46% fail on Horn
    • 0.91% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 11% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Steering linkage components (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Locking devices (22 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.46% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.46% fail on Steering box
    • 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 8.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Transmission
      • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.8% fail on Joints
    • 0.91% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.91% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.91% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.91% fail on Tank (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Seats
      • 0.91% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Chassis
      • 0.46% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.46% fail on Doors
      • 0.46% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.46% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.46% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.5% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.1% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.91% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages