MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » Matrix » 2003

Hyundai Matrix MOT Results

Registered in 2003
50.6% pass rate
from 399 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Matrix is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Sub-frames (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Sub-frame (16 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.75% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.25% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 10% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 10% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.50% fail on Joints
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.75% fail on Sub-frame (25 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Sub-frame condition (26 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Tank
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe
    • 0.25% fail on Chassis
      • 0.25% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.25% fail on Body
      • 0.25% fail on Panel
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.25% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.25% fail on Cabs
      • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (85% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (82% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.25% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 6.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (77% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.75% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.50% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.50% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.50% fail on Pedal
      • 0.50% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 8.3% fail on Wipers (91% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.25% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.75% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.50% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.50% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.25% fail on Stop lamp
  • 7.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.75% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.75% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.5% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.75% fail on Power steering
      • 0.75% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plates (190% worse than other 2003 cars)

Search Good Garages