Hyundai Matrix MOT Results

Registered in 2002
46.7% pass rate
from 182 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Matrix is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Brakes (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.55% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.55% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.55% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.55% fail on Cable
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal
    • 0.55% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.55% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.55% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.55% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 23% fail on Body, chassis, structure (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 14% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 14% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 14% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.6% fail on Door condition
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's door (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Boot lid (26 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Boot lid condition (29 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Body
      • 0.55% fail on Other body component
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Sub-frames (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Sub-frame (29 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.55% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.55% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.55% fail on Springs
      • 0.55% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.55% fail on Mounting
    • 0.55% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.55% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers
    • 6.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.55% fail on View to rear
      • 0.55% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.7% fail on Steering
    • 6.6% fail on Steering linkage components (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.55% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.55% fail on Power steering
      • 0.55% fail on Operation
  • 7.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.55% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.55% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.55% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.55% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.55% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.55% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Attachment
  • 0.55% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages