MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » ix35 » 2010

Hyundai ix35 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.9% pass rate
from 3,223 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai ix35 is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Springs (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Coil springs (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Coil spring (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Mounting
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.093% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.093% fail on Linkage
      • 0.031% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Suspension rods (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.062% fail on Axles
      • 0.062% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.062% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.031% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Brakes (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.031% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.031% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.031% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.031% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.062% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.62% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.031% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.031% fail on Cable
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Pedal
    • 0.40% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.093% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.062% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.031% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.031% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.031% fail on Operation
  • 9.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (32% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Stop lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.22% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.093% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.031% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.031% fail on Horn
    • 0.28% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.031% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.19% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.031% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.031% fail on Switch
    • 0.031% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.031% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.031% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Door condition (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Driver's door (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Door condition (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Transmission (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Drive shafts (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Joints (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Drive shaft (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.031% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.19% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.062% fail on Undertray
    • 0.031% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
    • 0.031% fail on Towbar
      • 0.031% fail on Coupling
    • 0.031% fail on Body
      • 0.031% fail on Other body component
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.031% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.093% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.093% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Exhaust emissions (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Compression ignition (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.093% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Spark ignition (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (71% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Catalyst emissions (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.031% fail on Undertray
    • 0.031% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.47% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.43% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment
      • 0.031% fail on Requirements
    • 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Airbags
      • 0.031% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Hyundai ix35 (2009 - 2015)
    Good value for money. Comfortable and refined interior. Available with two or four-wheel drive. Low CO2 emissions. Five-year warranty. Generous equipment. Full size spare wheel.

    Search Good Garages