Hyundai Coupe MOT Results

Registered in 2003
48.1% pass rate
from 501 tests in 2021
(14% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Coupe is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 23% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 19% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance (88% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (86% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (79% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Plate brake tester (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (82% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Brake discs (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.60% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.60% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.60% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.20% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.20% fail on Leaks
    • 0.20% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.20% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes (74% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.4% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.20% fail on Springs
      • 0.20% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.20% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (95% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Transmission (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Joints (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Joints
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system (95% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's door (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Chassis
      • 0.40% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Pipe
    • 0.20% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Panel
    • 0.20% fail on Cabs
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (70% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.80% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.40% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Horn
    • 1.00% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.00% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.60% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.40% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
  • 9.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.20% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.40% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.40% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type
  • 5.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.20% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.20% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.80% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.80% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Steering play
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plates (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.00% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.00% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.40% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.20% fail on Airbags
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages