Hyundai Atoz MOT Results
Registered in 199855.3% pass rate
from 47 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Atoz is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Brakes
(110% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 11% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
11% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Rbt
- 8.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Decelerometer
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
8.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
15% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 4.3% fail on Brake pads
-
4.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Brake discs (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 2.1% fail on Hand lever
-
2.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 2.1% fail on Brake fluid
- 2.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
2.1% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 2.1% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
6.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Sub-frame
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
6.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Visibility
- 11% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Wipers
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 8.5% fail on Headlamp
-
4.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.1% fail on Side repeaters
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.1% fail on Battery(ies)
-
8.5% fail on
Headlamps
-
8.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.4% fail on
Transmission
-
6.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 6.4% fail on Joints
-
6.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.3% fail on
Doors
(6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Driver's door
- 2.1% fail on Door condition
-
2.1% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 2.1% fail on Door condition
-
2.1% fail on
Driver's door
-
6.4% fail on
Transmission
-
4.3% fail on
Steering
-
2.1% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.1% fail on Steering rack
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.1% fail on Track rod end
-
2.1% fail on
Steering gear
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.1% fail on
Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Condition