MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Honda » Jazz » 2016

Honda Jazz MOT Results

Registered in 2016
90.4% pass rate
from 18,576 tests in 2021
(46% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Honda Jazz is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (28% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Washers (57% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on View to rear
      • 0.038% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.011% fail on Condition of glass (80% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Windscreen (80% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0054% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (32% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Tread depth (76% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Size/type
  • 1.3% fail on Brakes (54% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Mechanical brake components (53% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Brake linings and pads (48% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.081% fail on Brake discs and drums (83% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Brake discs (83% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.011% fail on Lever
        • 0.0054% fail on Linkage
        • 0.0054% fail on Clevis joint
        • 0.0054% fail on Pivot
    • 0.41% fail on Brake performance (44% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (47% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.043% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.043% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.027% fail on Parking brake performance (67% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0054% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0054% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.016% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.027% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (68% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Pedal
      • 0.011% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.016% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (80% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0054% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.0054% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.0054% fail on Lever
    • 0.0054% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 1.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (70% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.070% fail on Headlamps (90% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Headlamp (90% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.043% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (89% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Side repeaters (94% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.0054% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.016% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.016% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.0054% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.0054% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 0.13% fail on Suspension (94% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.027% fail on Anti-roll bars (87% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.011% fail on Wheel bearings (87% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Suspension arms (98% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0054% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0054% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (78% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.011% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.011% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.011% fail on Body
      • 0.0054% fail on Panel
      • 0.0054% fail on Other body component
    • 0.011% fail on Seats
      • 0.011% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.0054% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0054% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0054% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.0054% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0054% fail on Towbar condition
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.086% fail on Condition
      • 0.0054% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.016% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.086% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (90% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Exhaust emissions (93% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Spark ignition (87% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Catalyst emissions (75% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (94% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0054% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.022% fail on Noise suppression (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Undertray (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0054% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.0054% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.059% fail on Identification of the vehicle (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Registration plates (72% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.032% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Steering linkage components (93% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0054% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0054% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.0054% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.011% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.0054% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0054% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.027% fail on Road Wheels (86% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Attachment (81% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Honda Jazz (2015 - 2020)
    Unrivalled practicality and versatility. Plenty of room for four adults to travel in comfort. Surprisingly fun to drive, especially 1.5 i-VTEC Sport.

    Search Good Garages